Both Sides Of The Issue

In 2005, after the passing of the Civil Union Bill came into effect, Destiny New Zealand leader Richard Lewis said "It really changes the face and nature of that dynamic of marriage which is a tragedy for the future generations who we want to enjoy marriage for what it is" (Destiny New Zealand is the political arm for Destiny Church). Clearly Lewis' ignorance of the difference between a Civil Union and Gay Marriage is highlighted through his statement. A New Zealand Catholic Church spokeswoman also emphasised priests would not conduct the ceremonies.

Now if you ask just about anyone, the majority will tell you they're all in favour for equal rights for homosexuals. In housing, jobs, equal benefits etc. With regards to the definitions earlier, a Civil Union is valid to a point. They still remain to be inferior to a marriage. 
 

So homosexuals want to get married, this shouldnt be so bad right? Funnily enough, bring up legalising gay marriage and you face opposition.

Gay rights groups, such as GLAD (Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders) argue that excluding gay and lesbian couples from the institution of marriage cannot be justified. They argue that only marriage provides a legal safety net protecting couples emotional bonds and economic safety. Some could even argue this to be a matter of Human Rights.